flowchart TD
A[Read count] --> B[Signal strength]
B --> C[Alignment validation]
C --> D[Context evaluation]
D --> E[Confidence level]
Read count vs confidence
Semi-quantitative interpretation of Nanopore detection signals
Note
Private This page documents internal logic for interpreting read count and confidence levels in detection workflows.
Overview
Nanopore sequencing 在 pathogen detection 中:
read count ≠ absolute quantification
但也 ≠ 沒有意義
👉 它是一種 semi-quantitative signal
Core concept
read count 反映:
- abundance(部分)
- sequencing depth
- library bias
- stochastic variation
因此:
read count 必須與其他指標一起解讀
Signal interpretation layers
Layer 1:Presence signal
- 是否存在 reads?
👉 只能回答:
“可能存在”
Layer 2:Strength
- read count
- relative abundance
👉 提供:
signal 強度
Layer 3:Support
- alignment quality
- coverage
👉 提供:
是否可信
Layer 4:Context
- sample type
- control
- biology
👉 決定:
是否有意義
Conceptual model
Internal interpretation tiers(可自行定義)
| Tier | Description | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 0 | No detection | None |
| Tier 1 | Very low reads | Very low |
| Tier 2 | Moderate reads | Suggestive |
| Tier 3 | High reads + good alignment | Strong |
👉 ⚠️ threshold 需依專案定義
Key influencing factors
- sequencing depth
- host DNA proportion
- library efficiency
- genome size(target organism)
- GC bias
Practical considerations
Low read count
可能:
- early infection
- low abundance organism
- contamination
👉 必須搭配:
- alignment
- control
High read count
通常:
較可信 但仍需確認:
specificity
context
Clinical vs environmental
Clinical sample
- 偏向高 specificity
- 低 read count 需謹慎
Environmental sample
- 高 diversity
- 低 read count 常見
Key principle
Tip
Read count 是訊號強度,而不是證據本身。
Internal notes(可填)
- read count threshold:
- coverage cutoff:
- control rule:
- reporting criteria: